First off, let’s clear the air: no, Magnus Carlsen didn’t solve chess. That would be like solving pizza. Sure, you can perfect a recipe, but there are infinite toppings and ways to burn your tongue. But the way Carlsen plays? It’s fair to ask if he’s secretly running on some kind of Silicon Valley AI chip.
For those who are new to this whole “solving chess” idea, it’s the notion that someone—or something—could figure out the perfect move in every possible position. Like a Sudoku puzzle, but with 32 pieces and an opponent actively trying to ruin your day. Solving chess would mean there’s no mystery left, just cold, hard math. Where’s the fun in that?
Magnus, however, has made chess look so easy for so long that some people wonder if he’s secretly got the cheat codes. I mean, the guy has won games where the rest of us would be desperately Googling “what to do when your knight is lonely.” His intuition, calculation, and ability to grind out wins in even the dullest positions are unmatched. But that doesn’t mean he’s cracked the game’s code. If he had, he’d probably retire and spend his days trolling people online with fake usernames like “QueenSnatcher99.”
Why People Think He’s Solved It
One word: dominance. Carlsen’s reign as World Champion was like that one kid on the playground who hogged the swing set all recess. Sure, others got close to dethroning him, but he’d just casually remind them that he’s Magnus Carlsen and proceed to outplay them like it’s a friendly game of checkers.
Then there’s his rapid and blitz skills. If classical chess is a thoughtful debate, rapid and blitz are rap battles, and Magnus is the Eminem of chess. He’s got the rhythm, the flow, and the ability to destroy you in 30 seconds flat.
Is Carlsen Really the GOAT? Enter Garry Kasparov
Sure, Magnus Carlsen is the poster child of modern chess—streaming games, dominating tournaments, and looking way too chill while doing it. But before Magnus was even born, there was Garry Kasparov, the original chess boss. If Carlsen’s the sleek smartphone, Kasparov is the indestructible Nokia that started it all.
Kasparov didn’t just win; he ruled with an iron fist—like a king refusing to abdicate. He held the World Chess Championship title for a whopping 15 years. Fifteen! That’s longer than some pop bands stay together. And during that reign, he defeated everyone. Humans, computers—you name it, Kasparov beat it.
Now, Magnus fans might argue he’s better because of his adaptability and insane rating. But Kasparov didn’t have chess engines and YouTube tutorials at his fingertips. He built his empire on pure brainpower, books, and enough mental endurance to scare his opponents into early retirement.
Why Chess Isn’t Solved (Yet)
Even with the rise of supercomputers and chess engines that make us humans look like toddlers playing tic-tac-toe, chess remains unsolved. The game’s complexity is mind-boggling. To solve it, you’d need to calculate every possible move, response, and counter-response from the starting position to the very end. And unless you’re sitting on a quantum computer with infinite time, good luck with that.
Magnus, as brilliant as he is, doesn’t play perfect chess. (Shocking, I know.) He’s human, which means he sometimes makes mistakes, has bad hair days, and probably eats too many snacks during tournaments. What makes him extraordinary isn’t perfection—it’s his ability to make the best out of imperfect positions. He’s like a master chef working with leftovers.
Magnus’ Own Words
Magnus himself has joked about the idea of “solving chess.” In interviews, he’s said he just tries to play good, logical moves and see what happens. No secret formula. No blueprint hidden in a Norwegian fjord. Just years of hard work, natural talent, and probably a dash of black magic.
He’s also openly embraced the uncertainty and creativity of the game. Chess, to Magnus Carlsen, isn’t about finding the perfect move every time; it’s about outthinking your opponent, navigating chaos, and occasionally sacrificing a bishop to ruin someone’s day.
The Verdict
So, did Magnus Carlsen solve chess? Nah. He’s just really, really good at it. Like, so good that it feels unfair. But chess remains unsolved, which is great news for the rest of us. It means the game still has room for surprises, for creativity, and for those of us who still think the Scholar’s Mate is peak strategy.
Magnus didn’t solve chess, but he did show us how beautifully complex it can be. And for that, we’ll keep watching, playing, and wondering if we’ll ever be half as good as the guy who’s basically the LeBron James of pawns and rooks.
I’m the senior editor of Attacking Chess, a keen chess player, rated above 2200 in chess.com.